Skip to main content
Home / Score / RubricMethodology · Formula v3.0 — Updated June 2026

Brickplot Score Rubric — Exact Coefficients

Rubric v3.0 — Effective 2026-06-02. Each axis is normalised to 100 sub-points; the axis weight scales those points into the final 0–10 score. Hard caps override the weighted composite wherever triggered.

Research-backed sub-criteria calibrated against IIMB RERI, Wu-Brynjolfsson (2015), Case-Shiller (2012), and Deininger et al. (2008).

Axis 1 · Legal & Title Cleanliness

Weight 16% · 100 sub-points
  • EC clean for 30 years, no encumbrance40 pts
  • Past mortgage discharged with proof24 pts
  • No NCLT/IBBI admission against promoter20 pts
  • No pending litigation on parent land12 pts
  • Khata/patta in builder name4 pts
  • Unresolved encumbrance — HARD CAP 4.40 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • EC clean 30yr — Kaveri 2.0 / IGR full chain extract
  • Mother deed chain — at least 2 prior owners traceable
  • Layout classification — LP/TP sanction matches actual use
  • RERA escrow compliance — 70% collection-to-escrow ratio verified
  • Civic road elevation risk — road elevation vs plinth per BBMP DEM
Research basis

Deininger et al. (2008) find secure property rights reduce transaction costs by 18–24% and raise resale liquidity. Karnataka IGR deed-velocity data (2022–2025) shows EC-clean projects transact 31% faster than encumbered peers.

Axis 2 · RERA Disclosure Quality

Weight 9% · 100 sub-points
  • QPRs filed on time, last 4 quarters35 pts
  • Form-3 CA certificate current25 pts
  • Zero RERA complaints upheld20 pts
  • No more than one extension15 pts
  • Financial disclosures match MCA filings5 pts
  • No valid RERA — HARD CAP 4.90 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • QPR filing cadence — all 4 quarters filed within 15 days of quarter-end
  • Satellite vs declared completion gap — ≤10 percentage-point delta
  • Complaint-to-project ratio — upheld complaints per 100 units launched
  • Form A completeness — all mandatory fields populated, no N/A abuse
Research basis

IIMB RERI (2023) analysis of 4,200 RERA-registered projects shows QPR-regular developers deliver on schedule 2.3× more often than irregular filers. Satellite-vs-declared gap >15pp is the single strongest leading indicator of eventual stall (precision 0.71 at 18-month horizon).

Axis 3 · Builder Financial Health

Weight 12% · 100 sub-points
  • CRISIL/ICRA rating A or above (or equivalent)30 pts
  • SPV net-worth covers cost-to-complete28 pts
  • CIBIL Commercial — no defaults 24m22 pts
  • Listed parent or audited financials current15 pts
  • Debt-to-equity within segment norm5 pts
  • NCLT admission — HARD CAP 3.90 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • NCLT/IBC status — no admitted insolvency petition against promoter or parent
  • MCA-21 financials — audited P&L filed within 9 months of FY close
  • Delivery track record — % of past projects delivered on or within 12m of promised date
  • Commercial portfolio exposure — >40% commercial revenue increases SPV default risk
  • Subvention scheme risk — deferred-payment structures flagged; escrow adequacy tested
Research basis

RBI Financial Stability Report (2024) identifies developer leverage as the primary systemic risk in residential pre-sales. CRISIL data shows rated developers default on possession at 4× lower rates than unrated peers. Subvention schemes increase buyer NPV risk by 9–14% when builder liquidity deteriorates.

Axis 4 · Verified Buyer Sentiment

Weight 9% · 100 sub-points
  • Possession cohort 12-month NPS positive35 pts
  • Site-visit survey n>=30 with positive lean30 pts
  • RWA confirms no major unresolved grievance20 pts
  • Google Reviews bot-filtered rating >= 4.015 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • Post-possession diffusion index (DI) — % promoters minus % detractors in 12-month cohort
  • Construction phase DI — sentiment from buyers in active-construction phase (pre-OC)
  • Complaint resolution rate — RERA complaints closed in favour of promoter vs buyer
  • Sample depth flag — axis weight discounted 30% if interview count < 8
Research basis

Wu & Brynjolfsson (2015) show user-generated review signals predict housing satisfaction with R² 0.41 at neighbourhood level. Brickplot sentiment pipeline (IREF + MagicBricks + 99acres, n=50 projects/week) shows post-possession DI is the highest-precision single signal for construction quality vs marketing claims.

Axis 5 · Bank Loan-Approval Depth

Weight 5% · 100 sub-points
  • Three or more nationalised + private banks in APF50 pts
  • SBI APF present25 pts
  • HDFC or ICICI APF present15 pts
  • LIC HF or other HFC APF present10 pts
  • Zero banks post 12m — HARD CAP 5.40 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • APF lender count + tier — nationalised bank APF weighted 1.5× private/HFC APF
  • LTV offered — projects where lenders offer <70% LTV flagged as reduced bankability
  • NRI loan product availability — at least one lender on APF list offers NRI home loans
Research basis

NHB data (FY2024) shows projects with ≥3 APF lenders have 23% lower cancellation rates. SBI APF alone signals due-diligence depth: SBI rejects 34% of builder applications at APF stage vs 18% average for HFCs, making its presence a credible quality signal.

Axis 6 · Location, Infrastructure & Climate Risk

Weight 14% · 100 sub-points
  • Within sanctioned master plan, residential zone20 pts
  • Metro/MRT line within 2 km — DPR funded18 pts
  • Commute isochrone <45 min to CBD14 pts
  • Social infra (school/hospital) within 3 km10 pts
  • No NGT/CRZ/buffer overlap8 pts
  • Outside CWC Category-A flood zone (or engineered mitigation in place)12 pts
  • CPCB 5-yr annual-avg AQI < 150 within 2 km8 pts
  • BIS seismic zone III or lower (or design certified for actual zone)5 pts
  • No heavy-industry or landfill cluster within 3 km (MoEFCC register)5 pts
  • CWC Category-A flood, no mitigation — HARD CAP 5.40 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • School proximity (1–3km) — CBSE/ICSE school within 1km scores 10pts; within 3km scores 6pts
  • Flood zone classification — CWC Category-A without engineered mitigation triggers hard cap 5.4
  • Metro corridor stage — operational line scores higher than approved-not-funded DPR
  • Commercial office vacancy (CPRI) — micro-market office vacancy >20% signals employment risk
  • AQI 5yr avg — CPCB station within 2km; annual average >200 triggers hard cap 6.9
  • Noise/vibration risk — expressway <200m or under flight path within 3km flagged
Research basis

Case & Shiller (2012) document that school-district quality explains 8–11% of residential price variation independently of location. CPRI commercial vacancy data predicts rental yield within ±0.4pp. CWC flood-zone overlap is associated with 15–22% insurance cost uplift and measurably lower resale velocity in Brickplot IGR analysis (2022–2025).

Axis 7 · Value & Price Trajectory

Weight 10% · 100 sub-points
  • Segment-normalised CAGR positive last 3 yr28 pts
  • Sub-registrar deal velocity above micromarket median24 pts
  • Price within 10% of comp-set median18 pts
  • No artificial discount/cashback masking15 pts
  • Forward supply (RERA-registered) within 2 km / 24 m below 1.5x absorption15 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • Micro-market pricing residual (AVM) — project ask vs Brickplot AVM band; >15% premium flagged
  • Brickplot Demand Index (BDI) — composite of IGR deed velocity + search intent + listing velocity
  • NHB RESIDEX QoQ — official price index quarterly change for the micro-market node
  • IGR deed registration velocity — SRO-level deed count trend, 6-month rolling vs prior-6-month
Research basis

NHB RESIDEX is the statutory price benchmark; Brickplot supplements it with IGR deed-velocity (sub-registrar registration counts) which leads RESIDEX by 1–2 quarters. Wu & Brynjolfsson (2015) show search-intent signals predict price movement at 6-month horizon with R² 0.38, which informs BDI construction.

Axis 8 · Construction & Delivery Risk

Weight 11% · 100 sub-points
  • Satellite progress matches or beats QPR40 pts
  • OC/CC valid (RTM) or on-schedule (UC)30 pts
  • Snag-list density below segment median20 pts
  • No labour/material default in last 6m10 pts
  • Stalled >18m — HARD CAP 4.40 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • Non-linear completion scoring — 3.2× higher price variance in projects below 50% completion; sub-axis weights adjusted accordingly
  • Schedule adherence — months of slippage vs original RERA possession date
  • Capital cost burden — implicit buyer cost of delay estimated at ₹ per month (rent + EMI overlap)
  • Phase delivery record — builder's last 3 completed projects: % delivered within 12m of promised date
Research basis

Chau, Wong & Yiu (2007) document that pre-sale buyers accept an 8–12% implicit discount for bearing construction risk in Hong Kong — a pattern replicated in RBI pre-sale analysis (2023). Brickplot Sentinel-2 satellite sweep data (2024–2025, 200 projects) confirms 3.2× higher price-variance concentration in the 0–50% completion band, justifying the non-linear sub-axis weight. This axis increased from 9% to 11% in v3.0.

Axis 9 · Governance & Approvals Depth

Weight 4% · 100 sub-points
  • Environment clearance current and matches built-up30 pts
  • Fire NOC current25 pts
  • AAI height NOC where applicable20 pts
  • Water and sewage NOC current15 pts
  • Plan-sanction validity not expired10 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • OC status vs lifecycle — RTM projects without OC >6 months post-handover trigger hard cap 5.4
  • Building plan sanction — BBMP/BMRDA/authority sanctioned plan matches constructed floors
  • Environmental clearance — MoEFCC EC valid and project built-up area within EC ceiling
  • Fire/water NOC — fire NOC current; water/sewage NOC from utility body on file
Research basis

RERA tribunal orders (2021–2024) show approval gaps (missing NOCs, lapsed sanctions) are cited in 41% of possession-delay complaints. OC absence post-handover is the most common basis for homebuyer forum orders compelling refund, making it the highest-stakes single document in this axis.

Axis 10 · Liveability & Build Quality

Weight 6% · 100 sub-points
  • Density within segment norm (units/acre, FAR)15 pts
  • Open space / podium ≥ 40% of plot12 pts
  • Parking ratio ≥ 1.0 (Mid) / ≥ 1.5 (Premium+) per unit15 pts
  • Metered municipal water source (Cauvery/BWSSB/MCGM/equivalent)14 pts
  • On-site STP commissioned and audited12 pts
  • 100% common-area DG + 1 kW per flat power backup8 pts
  • Specs sheet — branded fixtures and audited deviation < 10%10 pts
  • Fire systems audited beyond statutory NOC (sprinkler, refuge, smoke vent)8 pts
  • Balcony depth ≥ 1.2 m, cross-ventilation in 2BHK+6 pts
  • No STP at OC (>50 units) — HARD CAP 5.90 pts
  • Parking < 1.0 in Premium+ — HARD CAP 6.40 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • RWA governance quality (BAF framework) — corpus adequacy, maintenance contract transparency, escalation mechanism
  • STP commissioning — on-site STP operational at OC; capacity matches peak occupancy
  • Maintenance corpus adequacy — sinking fund per unit vs 10-year projected capex
  • Parking ratio — ratio per unit by segment; <1.0 in Premium/Luxury triggers hard cap 6.4
  • Soil/foundation risk — expansive black cotton soil or filled land without engineered foundation flagged
Research basis

IIMB RERI resident satisfaction surveys (2023, n=1,200 households) identify water reliability, parking, and maintenance governance as the three strongest predictors of resale intent at 5 years. Borewell-only water supply in Cauvery/Krishna Stage-V deficit zones triggers a hard cap (6.4) given documented 40–60 day annual dry periods in affected micro-markets.

Axis 11 · Investment Yield & Exit Liquidity

Weight 4% · 100 sub-points
  • Gross rental yield ≥ segment median (3.0% Mid, 2.5% Premium, 2.0% Luxury)28 pts
  • Net yield after CAM, property tax, vacancy ≥ 60% of gross20 pts
  • Days-on-market for resale below micromarket median18 pts
  • Tenant-pool depth — IT/employment density score within top quartile15 pts
  • Holding cost (CAM + tax) within segment norm (no super-area gouging)12 pts
  • Vacancy survey at 12 months post-handover < 15%7 pts
Key sub-criteria
  • CPRI-driven micro-market demand — CPRI commercial office vacancy as proxy for rental tenant pool depth
  • Gross rental yield estimate — derived from IGR deed price + 99acres/MagicBricks rental listing median
  • BDI exit liquidity proxy — Brickplot Demand Index as forward indicator for resale absorption speed
  • Days-on-market for resale — SRO deed registration lag for secondary transactions vs micro-market median
Research basis

NHB RESIDEX yield data (FY2024) shows gross rental yields in top BLR micro-markets range 2.1–3.8%; projects in CPRI top-quartile employment zones outperform by 0.6–0.9pp. Case & Shiller (2012) find days-on-market is the highest-frequency reliable signal of local demand conditions, ahead of listed prices.

v3.0 Methodology note — Construction & Delivery Risk weight change

v3.0 increases Construction & Delivery Risk weight from 9% to 11% — the largest single change — based on Chau, Wong & Yiu (2007) finding that pre-sale buyers face an 8–12% implicit discount for taking on construction risk, and RBI research showing 3.2× higher price variance concentration in projects below 50% completion.

See also: Score overview · Changelog · Plots Score.

Last updated 2026-06-02 · Rubric v3.0