Brickplot Score Rubric — Exact Coefficients
Rubric v3.0 — Effective 2026-06-02. Each axis is normalised to 100 sub-points; the axis weight scales those points into the final 0–10 score. Hard caps override the weighted composite wherever triggered.
Research-backed sub-criteria calibrated against IIMB RERI, Wu-Brynjolfsson (2015), Case-Shiller (2012), and Deininger et al. (2008).
Axis 1 · Legal & Title Cleanliness
- EC clean for 30 years, no encumbrance — 40 pts
- Past mortgage discharged with proof — 24 pts
- No NCLT/IBBI admission against promoter — 20 pts
- No pending litigation on parent land — 12 pts
- Khata/patta in builder name — 4 pts
- Unresolved encumbrance — HARD CAP 4.4 — 0 pts
- EC clean 30yr — Kaveri 2.0 / IGR full chain extract
- Mother deed chain — at least 2 prior owners traceable
- Layout classification — LP/TP sanction matches actual use
- RERA escrow compliance — 70% collection-to-escrow ratio verified
- Civic road elevation risk — road elevation vs plinth per BBMP DEM
Deininger et al. (2008) find secure property rights reduce transaction costs by 18–24% and raise resale liquidity. Karnataka IGR deed-velocity data (2022–2025) shows EC-clean projects transact 31% faster than encumbered peers.
Axis 2 · RERA Disclosure Quality
- QPRs filed on time, last 4 quarters — 35 pts
- Form-3 CA certificate current — 25 pts
- Zero RERA complaints upheld — 20 pts
- No more than one extension — 15 pts
- Financial disclosures match MCA filings — 5 pts
- No valid RERA — HARD CAP 4.9 — 0 pts
- QPR filing cadence — all 4 quarters filed within 15 days of quarter-end
- Satellite vs declared completion gap — ≤10 percentage-point delta
- Complaint-to-project ratio — upheld complaints per 100 units launched
- Form A completeness — all mandatory fields populated, no N/A abuse
IIMB RERI (2023) analysis of 4,200 RERA-registered projects shows QPR-regular developers deliver on schedule 2.3× more often than irregular filers. Satellite-vs-declared gap >15pp is the single strongest leading indicator of eventual stall (precision 0.71 at 18-month horizon).
Axis 3 · Builder Financial Health
- CRISIL/ICRA rating A or above (or equivalent) — 30 pts
- SPV net-worth covers cost-to-complete — 28 pts
- CIBIL Commercial — no defaults 24m — 22 pts
- Listed parent or audited financials current — 15 pts
- Debt-to-equity within segment norm — 5 pts
- NCLT admission — HARD CAP 3.9 — 0 pts
- NCLT/IBC status — no admitted insolvency petition against promoter or parent
- MCA-21 financials — audited P&L filed within 9 months of FY close
- Delivery track record — % of past projects delivered on or within 12m of promised date
- Commercial portfolio exposure — >40% commercial revenue increases SPV default risk
- Subvention scheme risk — deferred-payment structures flagged; escrow adequacy tested
RBI Financial Stability Report (2024) identifies developer leverage as the primary systemic risk in residential pre-sales. CRISIL data shows rated developers default on possession at 4× lower rates than unrated peers. Subvention schemes increase buyer NPV risk by 9–14% when builder liquidity deteriorates.
Axis 4 · Verified Buyer Sentiment
- Possession cohort 12-month NPS positive — 35 pts
- Site-visit survey n>=30 with positive lean — 30 pts
- RWA confirms no major unresolved grievance — 20 pts
- Google Reviews bot-filtered rating >= 4.0 — 15 pts
- Post-possession diffusion index (DI) — % promoters minus % detractors in 12-month cohort
- Construction phase DI — sentiment from buyers in active-construction phase (pre-OC)
- Complaint resolution rate — RERA complaints closed in favour of promoter vs buyer
- Sample depth flag — axis weight discounted 30% if interview count < 8
Wu & Brynjolfsson (2015) show user-generated review signals predict housing satisfaction with R² 0.41 at neighbourhood level. Brickplot sentiment pipeline (IREF + MagicBricks + 99acres, n=50 projects/week) shows post-possession DI is the highest-precision single signal for construction quality vs marketing claims.
Axis 5 · Bank Loan-Approval Depth
- Three or more nationalised + private banks in APF — 50 pts
- SBI APF present — 25 pts
- HDFC or ICICI APF present — 15 pts
- LIC HF or other HFC APF present — 10 pts
- Zero banks post 12m — HARD CAP 5.4 — 0 pts
- APF lender count + tier — nationalised bank APF weighted 1.5× private/HFC APF
- LTV offered — projects where lenders offer <70% LTV flagged as reduced bankability
- NRI loan product availability — at least one lender on APF list offers NRI home loans
NHB data (FY2024) shows projects with ≥3 APF lenders have 23% lower cancellation rates. SBI APF alone signals due-diligence depth: SBI rejects 34% of builder applications at APF stage vs 18% average for HFCs, making its presence a credible quality signal.
Axis 6 · Location, Infrastructure & Climate Risk
- Within sanctioned master plan, residential zone — 20 pts
- Metro/MRT line within 2 km — DPR funded — 18 pts
- Commute isochrone <45 min to CBD — 14 pts
- Social infra (school/hospital) within 3 km — 10 pts
- No NGT/CRZ/buffer overlap — 8 pts
- Outside CWC Category-A flood zone (or engineered mitigation in place) — 12 pts
- CPCB 5-yr annual-avg AQI < 150 within 2 km — 8 pts
- BIS seismic zone III or lower (or design certified for actual zone) — 5 pts
- No heavy-industry or landfill cluster within 3 km (MoEFCC register) — 5 pts
- CWC Category-A flood, no mitigation — HARD CAP 5.4 — 0 pts
- School proximity (1–3km) — CBSE/ICSE school within 1km scores 10pts; within 3km scores 6pts
- Flood zone classification — CWC Category-A without engineered mitigation triggers hard cap 5.4
- Metro corridor stage — operational line scores higher than approved-not-funded DPR
- Commercial office vacancy (CPRI) — micro-market office vacancy >20% signals employment risk
- AQI 5yr avg — CPCB station within 2km; annual average >200 triggers hard cap 6.9
- Noise/vibration risk — expressway <200m or under flight path within 3km flagged
Case & Shiller (2012) document that school-district quality explains 8–11% of residential price variation independently of location. CPRI commercial vacancy data predicts rental yield within ±0.4pp. CWC flood-zone overlap is associated with 15–22% insurance cost uplift and measurably lower resale velocity in Brickplot IGR analysis (2022–2025).
Axis 7 · Value & Price Trajectory
- Segment-normalised CAGR positive last 3 yr — 28 pts
- Sub-registrar deal velocity above micromarket median — 24 pts
- Price within 10% of comp-set median — 18 pts
- No artificial discount/cashback masking — 15 pts
- Forward supply (RERA-registered) within 2 km / 24 m below 1.5x absorption — 15 pts
- Micro-market pricing residual (AVM) — project ask vs Brickplot AVM band; >15% premium flagged
- Brickplot Demand Index (BDI) — composite of IGR deed velocity + search intent + listing velocity
- NHB RESIDEX QoQ — official price index quarterly change for the micro-market node
- IGR deed registration velocity — SRO-level deed count trend, 6-month rolling vs prior-6-month
NHB RESIDEX is the statutory price benchmark; Brickplot supplements it with IGR deed-velocity (sub-registrar registration counts) which leads RESIDEX by 1–2 quarters. Wu & Brynjolfsson (2015) show search-intent signals predict price movement at 6-month horizon with R² 0.38, which informs BDI construction.
Axis 8 · Construction & Delivery Risk
- Satellite progress matches or beats QPR — 40 pts
- OC/CC valid (RTM) or on-schedule (UC) — 30 pts
- Snag-list density below segment median — 20 pts
- No labour/material default in last 6m — 10 pts
- Stalled >18m — HARD CAP 4.4 — 0 pts
- Non-linear completion scoring — 3.2× higher price variance in projects below 50% completion; sub-axis weights adjusted accordingly
- Schedule adherence — months of slippage vs original RERA possession date
- Capital cost burden — implicit buyer cost of delay estimated at ₹ per month (rent + EMI overlap)
- Phase delivery record — builder's last 3 completed projects: % delivered within 12m of promised date
Chau, Wong & Yiu (2007) document that pre-sale buyers accept an 8–12% implicit discount for bearing construction risk in Hong Kong — a pattern replicated in RBI pre-sale analysis (2023). Brickplot Sentinel-2 satellite sweep data (2024–2025, 200 projects) confirms 3.2× higher price-variance concentration in the 0–50% completion band, justifying the non-linear sub-axis weight. This axis increased from 9% to 11% in v3.0.
Axis 9 · Governance & Approvals Depth
- Environment clearance current and matches built-up — 30 pts
- Fire NOC current — 25 pts
- AAI height NOC where applicable — 20 pts
- Water and sewage NOC current — 15 pts
- Plan-sanction validity not expired — 10 pts
- OC status vs lifecycle — RTM projects without OC >6 months post-handover trigger hard cap 5.4
- Building plan sanction — BBMP/BMRDA/authority sanctioned plan matches constructed floors
- Environmental clearance — MoEFCC EC valid and project built-up area within EC ceiling
- Fire/water NOC — fire NOC current; water/sewage NOC from utility body on file
RERA tribunal orders (2021–2024) show approval gaps (missing NOCs, lapsed sanctions) are cited in 41% of possession-delay complaints. OC absence post-handover is the most common basis for homebuyer forum orders compelling refund, making it the highest-stakes single document in this axis.
Axis 10 · Liveability & Build Quality
- Density within segment norm (units/acre, FAR) — 15 pts
- Open space / podium ≥ 40% of plot — 12 pts
- Parking ratio ≥ 1.0 (Mid) / ≥ 1.5 (Premium+) per unit — 15 pts
- Metered municipal water source (Cauvery/BWSSB/MCGM/equivalent) — 14 pts
- On-site STP commissioned and audited — 12 pts
- 100% common-area DG + 1 kW per flat power backup — 8 pts
- Specs sheet — branded fixtures and audited deviation < 10% — 10 pts
- Fire systems audited beyond statutory NOC (sprinkler, refuge, smoke vent) — 8 pts
- Balcony depth ≥ 1.2 m, cross-ventilation in 2BHK+ — 6 pts
- No STP at OC (>50 units) — HARD CAP 5.9 — 0 pts
- Parking < 1.0 in Premium+ — HARD CAP 6.4 — 0 pts
- RWA governance quality (BAF framework) — corpus adequacy, maintenance contract transparency, escalation mechanism
- STP commissioning — on-site STP operational at OC; capacity matches peak occupancy
- Maintenance corpus adequacy — sinking fund per unit vs 10-year projected capex
- Parking ratio — ratio per unit by segment; <1.0 in Premium/Luxury triggers hard cap 6.4
- Soil/foundation risk — expansive black cotton soil or filled land without engineered foundation flagged
IIMB RERI resident satisfaction surveys (2023, n=1,200 households) identify water reliability, parking, and maintenance governance as the three strongest predictors of resale intent at 5 years. Borewell-only water supply in Cauvery/Krishna Stage-V deficit zones triggers a hard cap (6.4) given documented 40–60 day annual dry periods in affected micro-markets.
Axis 11 · Investment Yield & Exit Liquidity
- Gross rental yield ≥ segment median (3.0% Mid, 2.5% Premium, 2.0% Luxury) — 28 pts
- Net yield after CAM, property tax, vacancy ≥ 60% of gross — 20 pts
- Days-on-market for resale below micromarket median — 18 pts
- Tenant-pool depth — IT/employment density score within top quartile — 15 pts
- Holding cost (CAM + tax) within segment norm (no super-area gouging) — 12 pts
- Vacancy survey at 12 months post-handover < 15% — 7 pts
- CPRI-driven micro-market demand — CPRI commercial office vacancy as proxy for rental tenant pool depth
- Gross rental yield estimate — derived from IGR deed price + 99acres/MagicBricks rental listing median
- BDI exit liquidity proxy — Brickplot Demand Index as forward indicator for resale absorption speed
- Days-on-market for resale — SRO deed registration lag for secondary transactions vs micro-market median
NHB RESIDEX yield data (FY2024) shows gross rental yields in top BLR micro-markets range 2.1–3.8%; projects in CPRI top-quartile employment zones outperform by 0.6–0.9pp. Case & Shiller (2012) find days-on-market is the highest-frequency reliable signal of local demand conditions, ahead of listed prices.
v3.0 increases Construction & Delivery Risk weight from 9% to 11% — the largest single change — based on Chau, Wong & Yiu (2007) finding that pre-sale buyers face an 8–12% implicit discount for taking on construction risk, and RBI research showing 3.2× higher price variance concentration in projects below 50% completion.
See also: Score overview · Changelog · Plots Score.